
Psalm 104 is a tribute to God’s creation: But along the way, does it also help to resolve a great debate among Christians, as to the age of the earth?
As a young follower of Jesus in college, one of my favorite Scripture songs came from Psalm 104:
- I will sing unto the Lord as long as I live: I will sing praise to my God while I have my being. My meditation of him shall be sweet: I will be glad in the Lord.
Bless thou the Lord, O my soul. Praise ye the Lord. (Psalm 104:33-35 KJV)
I would help to lead my small Pentecostal church in worship with this song. It truly was a sweet time of prayer and praise, every time we lifted up our voices to glorify His Name.
Most evangelical churches today no longer sing such simple Scripture songs, taken directly from the words of the King James Version of the Bible. As the classic cadence of the King James Version gives way to the plethora of newer, often tribal, translations, we tend to miss the joy of simply rehearsing the words of Scripture together, preferring songs that are only loosely based on translations of the Bible, from what we hear on KLove radio, or from Australia’s Hillsong, or California’s Bethel Church. If there was one advantage of having the King James Version of the Bible, as the primary translation for all English speaking Christians, it was having the ability to memorize Scripture in one voice, among a wide collection of believers, particularly through the vehicle of song.
As my church has been reading through the entire Book of Psalms this summer, I thought I would write a meditation on this great psalm, as a whole. Psalm 104 stands out as a classic, not simply because it rings in my memory from a once-popular Scripture chorus, but because it addresses so many key doctrines of the faith.
Psalm 104: A Creation Psalm
Old Testament scholars will tell you that Psalm 104 is a creation psalm, a song that celebrates God’s miracle of creating and ordering the world. When many Christians read their Bibles, they tend to drill down on the first few chapters of Genesis, as telling the whole, complete story of creation.
Nothing can be further from the truth. The Bible has dozens of passages that speak of creation, and a number of these passages are found in the psalms, including Psalms 8, 19, 29, and 148.
Much of Psalm 104 gives praise to God, as Creator, making it clear that the universe owes its very existence to the sovereign purposes of the Lord. Who is this Creator? None other than the God of Israel. But you will also find some nuggets here that might give an indication of exactly what God did, in the act of creation. See what you think.
Is Science and the Bible in Conflict With One Another? Or is the “Conflict” Imaginary?
For example, consider the first two verses:
- Bless the Lord, O my soul!
O Lord my God, you are very great!
You are clothed with splendor and majesty,
covering yourself with light as with a garment,
stretching out the heavens like a tent. (Psalm 104:1-2 ESV)
In the 1920s and 1930s, most astronomers adopted the steady state theory of cosmology, which essentially argued for an eternal universe, with no beginning and no end. God seemed completely out of the picture.
But when Edwin Hubble first observed the continuous expansion of the universe, which was then confirmed by the discovery of cosmic microwave radiation in 1964, the steady state model collapsed, being taken over by the “Big Bang Theory.” The Big Bang, though not a scientific proof for the existence of a creator, is fully consistent with the biblical teaching that there indeed was a beginning…. and if a beginning, therefore a Beginner!
Moreover, the literary image of “stretching out the heavens like a tent” perfectly matches Hubble’s description of a continuously expanding universe. Now, I am not saying that the psalm writer in any way knowingly predicted the discovery of the Big Bang, a few dozen centuries earlier than the scientists did. The ancient Israelite author probably just used the imagery of a stretched-out tent, a familiar part of Hebrew life, to describe what he saw in the sky. Nevertheless, if we consider the Bible to be inspired by God, it should not surprise us to find the psalm writer giving us an exact description of the expansion of the universe, consistent with yet-unknown Big Bang cosmology.
I think of it as a kind of “easter egg,” a hidden feature in the Bible, put there by God, meant to encourage Christians many centuries later, beset by the persistent atheism of the secularizing culture around us. God already knew about the Big Bang, centuries before the scientists did. Why? Because He created the universe!
Many of my fellow believers, who are Young Earth Creationists, object at this point, as Big Bang cosmology requires a universe to be about 13.799 billion years old, orders of magnitude older than the 6,000 to 10,000 years required by the Young Earth model. But this particular objection, despite whatever else might be attractive about Young Earth Creationism, has always puzzled me. For the same language about the “stretching out [of] the heavens” is repeated at least ten more times throughout the Bible (Job 9:8; Isaiah 40:22; 42:5; 44:24; 45:12; 48:13; 51:13; Jeremiah 10:12; 51:15; Zechariah 12:1).
Is this just a coincidence? Does the Bible just happen to be lucky, and get it right, so many times?
Or does it make more sense to think that God knew exactly what He was doing when He inspired the Word of God to be written?
I do not know about you, but I am more persuaded by the latter.
What is Psalm 104 Trying to Tell Us? How God Did Things, or Who God Is?
Some may insist at this point and say that we should not look to the Bible to get our science. Those critics have a good point to make. For if you were to take verse 5 out of context, as many Christians did for about 1500 years, you would never pass your high school science classes!
- He set the earth on its foundations,
so that it should never be moved.
A non-movable earth? Galileo saw the problem here, when he sought to favor the Copernican theory that the earth indeed moves around the sun, as opposed to the older geocentric model, that posited a sun moving around a fixed earth. I do not know of a single Christian today, except for a handful of naysayers in the deep, dark corners of the Internet (these people are real folks!), who would still champion the geocentric model of the solar system!
But the language of this verse is not concerning the earth’s physical location. Rather the foundation of the earth is upon the Word of God (see verse 7 below: “At your rebuke, [the waters] fled“). This verse 5 speaks of God’s power to sustain the universe, which He created to be secure, by the surety of God’s Word. “Everyone then who hears these words of mine and does them will be like a wise man who built his house on the rock” (Matthew 7:24 ESV).
Just as we have confidence in God as Creator, so we also have confidence in God as our Redeemer, through Christ. Those who put their trust in Christ are building their life on the strong foundation.
This theme of confidence in God is repeated throughout the psalm, as the birds have their dwelling places (v. 12-13, 17) and the wild goats and badgers have a home among the mountain rocks (v. 18).
The psalmist even announces the security and comfort of the Lord, for a land-based, Jewish community that was terrified by the depths of the sea:
- Here is the sea, great and wide,
which teems with creatures innumerable,
living things both small and great.
There go the ships,
and Leviathan, which you formed to play in it (Psalm 104:25-26).
Tales of the great sea monsters, like the Leviathan, are not a threat. Instead, they are playful in God’s world!
Some see the Leviathan as a real creature, even suggesting that the Leviathan was a type of sea dinosaur, present with the humans, at creation. As I have written before, Christians may speculate as to the identity of this Leviathan, but such speculation can take us far away from the message of the text. The reason for mentioning Leviathan could be a lot simpler than that, thus defusing the objections of the skeptics. Many Bible scholars view the ancient Leviathan as a symbol of cosmic disorder, not be interpreted literally.
Jesus walked on water, in the Gospels, to demonstrate His mastery over creation. It should not surprise us then, that Psalm 104 tells us that we are not to be threatened by the sea monsters, as they are merely playful in the sea.
Thinking too hard about the identity of Leviathan can easily distract us from the main message of Psalm 104. We may gain some insight into exactly what God did in Creation, but such exploration should not cloud our vision from getting the bigger picture. God is a God of order, and not disorder. That is the point that the psalm writer wants to drive home. Psalm 104 is really not so much about how God created the universe, but rather, about the character of God: who God is.
A Reference to Creation, or Sneaking in a Reference to Noah’s Flood?
Still, there are some who resist in thinking Psalm 104 to be a hymn fully dedicated to praise the Lord as Creator. For example, in the following portion of the psalm, whereby God spoke His Word (“rebuke,” in verse 7), to separate the waters, some see this as a description of the aftermath of Noah’s flood.
- You covered [the earth] with the deep as with a garment;
the waters stood above the mountains.
At your rebuke they fled;
at the sound of your thunder they took to flight.
The mountains rose, the valleys sank down
to the place that you appointed for them.
You set a boundary that they may not pass,
so that they might not again cover the earth.(Psalm 104:6-9).
In these verses we have a description of a world covered by water at the outset. Then God separates the waters, then making a pledge to never again cover the surface of the earth with water. No matter what you think about “global climate change,” we have a promise here that the oceans will never rise enough to completely wipe out the earth’s land masses!
Those who advocate for a description of Noah’s flood here go on and contend that the psalm writer jumps around in time, to describe different events in the history of the world, apart from Creation. But while we can see how the psalm writer anachronistically speaks of “ships” in verse 26, that surely did not exist at Creation (yet note the present verb tense, as opposed to the past tense, in these verses), it is quite a stretch to contend that the writer is just jumping around to describe various events of world history, aside from Creation.
Are verses 6-9 really about the aftermath of Noah’s flood, where God calls judgment down upon the people of Noah’s generation?
There are some problems with this view. First, there is a mention of judgment in this psalm, but only towards the end of the text (“Let sinners be consumed from the earth, and let the wicked be no more,” verse 35). We are reminded that the God of Creation is also a God of Judgment. This is surely true.
But to read the theme of judgment, as with God’s judgment in the days of Noah, back into the earlier part of the psalm, seems very out of place. Instead, the separation of the waters harkens back to the very Creation event, as described in the very first chapter of Genesis, and not the Flood story:
- And God said, “Let there be an expanse in the midst of the waters, and let it separate the waters from the waters.” And God made the expanse and separated the waters that were under the expanse from the waters that were above the expanse. And it was so..(Genesis 1:-6-7 ESV).
In fact, you find some interesting parallels between the days of Creation, back in Genesis 1, and Psalm 104 (taken from the ESV Study Bible):
- Day 1: Psalm 104:2a. Light.
- Day 2: Psalm 104:2b-4. The “expanse” divides the waters
- Day 3: Psalm 104:5-13. Land and water distinct (including our verses 6-9). Verses 14-18. Vegetation and trees.
- Day 4: Psalm 104:19-24. Light-bearers as time-keepers.
- Day 5: Psalm 104:25-26. Sea creatures.
- Day 6: Psalm 104:21-24. Land animals and man. Verses 27-30: Food for all creatures.
You will notice the permanent boundary setting between the land and the waters takes place before the entrance of the sun and moon, as lights that help to mark the seasons and tell time:
- He made the moon to mark the seasons;
the sun knows its time for setting (Psalm 104:19 ESV).
Given everything we read here in Psalm 104, it is difficult to conclude that the earth will ever completely flood again with water, which pretty much rules out a global flood in the days of Noah…. which proponents of the “Noah’s-flood-in-Psalm-104” view wish to eagerly defend. Whatever Noah’s flood was, to insist on a global flood event, as opposed to a more local event, would introduce a convoluted way of reading the Scriptural text that need not exist.
Critics of the “local” flood view contend that after Noah’s flood, God promised not to flood the entire globe again, citing Genesis 9:11:
- I establish my covenant with you, that never again shall all flesh be cut off by the waters of the flood, and never again shall there be a flood to destroy the earth (ESV).
However, the Hebrew word translated as “earth” here can have multiple meanings. It could mean the entire planet, but it could also mean simply “land.” Few people bother to read later in the passage for additional clarity:
- And the waters shall never again become a flood to destroy all flesh. ( Genesis 9:15b ESV).
The “all flesh” that was destroyed in Noah’s day need not encompass the entire planet. The purpose of the flood was to wipe out “all flesh,” not to envelope the entire globe with water. Compare this with Psalm 104:9, which permanently fixes the boundary between the created land and the water, which appears to be global. There is no need to be dogmatic here, but because of this biblical data, I lean toward a less complicated reading of the passage.
Provision For Food For Meat-Eating Animals, At Creation
Likewise, the presence of animals at creation, that are made to devour other living animals, pretty much rules out the hypothesis that there was no animal death before the Fall of humanity, according to Psalm 104. At least, there is no dogmatic requirement to insist that there was no animal death before Adam’s Fall.
Recall that Psalm 104 speaks mainly of the act of creation, along the lines of Genesis 1, without touching upon later events, such as the Fall of humanity in Genesis 3:
- The young lions roar for their prey,
seeking their food from God. (Psalm 104:21 ESV).
If it has ever troubled you as to why God might have created lions with teeth, by which they can eat their animal prey, then spend some time in Psalm 104. The idea of animal death and suffering, prior to the Fall of humanity, does not appear to be of any concern to the psalmist.
Connecting Psalm 104 More Broadly to the Great Themes of the Bible
However, Psalm 104 does more than just proclaim the doctrine of creation. Other critical doctrines of the faith are brought to light as well. In addition to seeing that the God as Creator is also the God as the coming Judge, we also see the God who will come, through the Second Coming of Christ, to make all things right.
The New Testament quite frequently recalls the language of Daniel 13:7, that of the Son of Man, who comes “with the clouds of heaven,” as anticipating a time when Jesus will return to fully restore his creation:
- And then they will see the Son of Man coming in clouds with great power and glory. (Mark 13:26 ESV).
Where do we see this allusion to the restoration of all of things, through the Second Coming of Christ?
- He makes the clouds his chariot;
he rides on the wings of the wind;
he makes his messengers winds,
his ministers a flaming fire (Psalm 104:3-4 ESV).
The one who creates all things will return to restore all things. Which brings us full circle back to the final stanza of Psalm 104:
- May the glory of the Lord endure forever;
may the Lord rejoice in his works,
who looks on the earth and it trembles,
who touches the mountains and they smoke! (Psalm 104:31-32 ESV).
This is a God to be worshipped. This is a God who knows what He is doing. This is a God who reveals Himself in Nature. This is the God of Creation.
What a better way to close out the psalm, by meditating on the Lord of all Creation:
- My meditation of him shall be sweet: I will be glad in the Lord (Psalm 104:34 KJV).
- …………………………….
Here is what the Scripture song from the 1980s sounds like, and below that is a more contemporary version by the Israeli Yamma Ensemble, sung in ancient Hebrew. Crank this last video up, particularly after the 1 minute mark, because it is pretty cool:
May 15th, 2019 at 11:00 am
Two points.
.
First, in regard to ‘the foundations of the ‘earth’ not to be moved.
Here ‘earth’ is the Hebrew ‘eres’, (or ‘erets’).
‘Earth’ in Genesis 9:11, on the other hand is the Hebrew ‘ha-eres’.
A general review of these two different Hebrew words throughout the OT shows them to be land, and the whole terrestrial Earth, respectively.
‘eres’ = land.
‘ha-eres’ = whole terrestrial world.
This is supported additionally by the fact that Genesis 1-2 troubles with five distinct words for the conceptual spectrum from the whole physical world to the elements. Here I list and define those five, along with the respective first verse in which they occur.
1. ha-eres = Total down-here realm (Genesis 1:1)
2. eres = land mass(s) (Genesis 1: 10)
3. yabbashah = solid ground (descriptive) (Genesis 1:9)
4. ha-adamah = dirt (Genesis 1:25)
5. apar = material elements (Genesis 2:7)
A like usage is seen for heaven (Genesis 1:1 ) ‘ha-samayim’ and heaven (Genesis 1:8) ‘samayim’.
That’s two different terms, one for the general ‘up there’ realm, and the other for the special, life-and-ecology portion, which is the atmospheric, or non-celestial portion. The general term, ‘ha-samayim’, may be used for any portion, and depends on context. But the special term, ‘samayim’, is more exacting. This is confirmed in a general review of these two terms throughout the OT.
.
.
Now, second, in regard to Psalm 104 itself. Given the range of authorship contained in the scope of the Bible, this psalm is not necessarily authored from any kind of merely everyday frame of mind upon a merely everyday sense of the everyday natural world. Not even if the effort thereby is praise. For, consider:
The state of mind of Noah, and his seven, in the days and decades AFTER a geoglobal Flood.
Look, now, at the bit about the ‘foundations of the earth. That’s ‘eres’ there, not ‘ha-eres’.
Look, too, at the first animal kind named in the psalm. The wild ass. This kind, of all kinds, is the most known for being ACTIVELY, BRUTALLY wild in the face of being cooped up, or in the face of attempts to tame it. Not even Leviathan or Behemoth would keep up being so wild if somehow bound by an unbreakable number of leashes in various directions.
Noah would have felt for the animals on the Ark. He would thus have been SOOOOOOOOOOOOO thankful and relieved when the Earth was back to its everyday normal self.
This entire psalm, all its details together, vastly better matches that state of mind than it matches any other human group or context in history.
Not even John Glen (?), while in orbit, in having stated ‘I see the Great Lakes’, could compare. This psalm is not likely to be truly measurable by what it merely states.
‘Oh, look, I see the everyday normal natural world. Hmmm, let’s see, how much praise to God I can contrive about that.? Uhm, yes, let’s just go all out, and see if that is not to much for the topic or the reader. And, why should it be too much? It strictly need not be too much. One only hopes, then, that the average Believer will dutifully take that to heart.’
…dutifully??
Such stupidity. Noah had it far, far, far better. And he didn’t even try. It was not a contrived duty for him. It was ALL OUT in PURE inspiration. Nothing was contrived.
It therefore is only for us to relate to Noah.
This psalm is not about some ‘dutifully’ contriving NOMINAL psalmist.
If Noah surely made a psalm exactly like this, then on what basis do we say that this psalm does NOT originate with Noah?
It may be in a form edited for a con- or post-Exilic audience. That in no way disproves it originated with Noah.
LikeLike
May 15th, 2019 at 11:06 am
The Western melody is good. But it does not match this psalm. Nor does the repeated lines. This is a psalm, not an endless chorus line. A Middle Eastern melodic and vocal sensibility would be better.
LikeLike