Who created God? Good question. Atheists fall on their backside thinking this one through. It’s all in how deeply we can think—specifically being able to think outside the box of our own worldly experiences. Here…if you’re still wondering, I’ll save you a headache the next time someone asks you—God is transcendent.
Here’s a short video by Oxford mathematician and Christian apologist John Lennox that shows why you might not want to mess with someone who’s wise—particularly when he is wearing a grin.
John Lennox is a delightful, gentlemanly, brilliant and crafty defender of the faith. He gives atheists fits with his use of logic and his calm, unflappable, charitable demeanor. In 1962 he attended the last lectures of C.S. Lewis, to whom he is now sometimes compared. Dr. Lennox can hold his own, and give as good as he gets. Continue reading
Felix Barthe (1796-1863), Minister of Justice and Deputy by Honore Daumier, 1833
Some people will not allow themselves to be convinced by evidence. I touched upon this topic recently in a post entitled Judge for Yourself, that illustrates the need to explore the standard of proof we each demand, the need to check our biases, and our ability to weigh evidence.
Lee Strobel took the approach that he was willing to follow the evidence for a Creator whether it led him to an uncomfortable conclusion or not. Unfortunately, many atheists lack this kind of integrity.
Ironically, there are scientists who investigate the facts behind the Big Bang, the DNA molecule, the fine tuning of the universe, cellular machines, and many other physical phenomena and draw the conclusion that the data clearly indicates intelligent design. Yet some of them can’t call the designer ‘God’. Really?
However…before we throw any rocks at scientists for not having the integrity to counter their professional biases, shouldn’t we revisit our own biases—professional and otherwise?
As Ken Petzinger points out, how we approach theism determines a lot about our lives, and how we interact with the world. Here’s a thought-provoking, on-topic article entitled Unreasonable Doubt, that Mary Petzinger wanted to share. The article (by Jim Spiegel writing in Christianity Today, January 2011) calls intractable skepticism into the light of day. The byline reads “The reasons for unbelief are more complex than many atheists let on.” To read the article, click here.
HT: Mary Petzinger
Believe it or not, formal debates on the existence of God regularly turn out thousands of ticket-buying intellectuals to hear atheists and theists go at it. Although it may seem silly to give out medals for something every kindergartener should know, there is much to appreciate in well-turned arguments that support the affirmative.
Setting personal style biases aside, how do the best theists make their case for the existence of God? For a sampling of how heady this question can get, check out William Lane Craig, Research Professor of Philosophy at Talbot School of Theology. Sam Harris, one of today’s most prominent atheists, recently described Dr. Craig as “the one Christian apologist who seems to have put the fear of God into many of my fellow atheists.” Continue reading
An impact wrench is a fine tool for changing brake pads or tires. But it’s completely useless when searching for scientific evidence of God. For that job you need a Large Hadron Collider. Right? (The right tool for the job and all that.)
The recent experimental confirmation of the existence of the Higgs Boson and Higgs Field comprises a major milestone in mankind’s understanding of the universe. After 50 years of mind-numbing, abstract theoretical research, theologians and scientists are lining up to interpret the data. But not everyone is coming to the same conclusion.
Finding the Higgs Boson doesn’t prove the existence of God. On that theologians and scientists are in complete agreement. But some of them are as far apart on their interpretations as the tools they use. Continue reading