Tag Archives: apologetics

God Creates

I’m taking a fascinating apologetics course entitled “Creation and the Bible” offered by Reasons To Believe.  The course provides a great opportunity to take a different tack to Bible study.  It’s like strapping a lawnmower engine to the back of your devotional life and yanking the starter cord.  Wow, what a blessing!

Mystic Mountain

Mystic Mountain in the Carina Nebula

In the midst of a great deal of cerebral reading about Special and General Revelation, Martin Luther’s ideas on Sola Scriptura, Old-Earth Creationism, Dual Revelation, and Philosophical Reductionism (no one will speak to me at parties now—I’m sure), I started reflecting on the magnificence of the Creator and his ongoing creation. We can read the creation account in Genesis 1 & 2, and struggle  to fathom what that was like 13.7 billion years ago, but to really appreciate its magnificence, look at the science of astronomy.  Yes, God created, but importantly, he creates.

Gas Pillars

Gas Pillars in the Eagle Nebula (M16): Pillars of Creation in a Star-Forming Region

These whimsical, other-worldly images are photos from the Hubble Telescope. Photos! So if you want to debate whether or not God can do any particular thing, look at the worlds he is creating right now.  It’s pretty hard to argue—God has impressive credentials.

Dave Rudy recently sent this link that demonstrates the scale of the Universe (it requires Flash). Scroll your mouse wheel to go into to the smallest theoretical building blocks of matter or back out to the outer limits of space.  As you get way out there, you’ll begin to appreciate how massive these created worlds are.  And there are billions of them in the night sky.

Psalm 19 states, “The heavens declare the glory of God; the skies proclaim the work of his hands.  Day after day they pour forth speech; night after night they display knowledge.  There is no speech or language where their voice is not heard.”  The Apostle Paul wrote in Romans 1:20, “For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that men are without excuse.”  These verses support the doctrine of General Revelation—that God reveals himself through his physical creation (nature), and that this revelation is universally evident.  The Bible (Scripture) is his inspired Special Revelation, where he makes clear those things which cannot be revealed by observing the natural world, such as the person and teaching of Jesus Christ and the resurrection.

As Lon Solomon would say, “So what?”  So we have two categories of revelation.  Great.  Huzzah for theologians.  But before yawning over General and Special Revelation consider this: what if all that groundbreaking scientific research can bring to bear regarding our understanding of the Universe actually supported God’s special revelation in the Scriptures?  In other words, how exciting would it be to discover that faith and science are not in conflict, but actually compliment each other?  What if some of the smartest and most gifted scientists—men and women who had distinguished themselves in fields like astrophysics and bioengineering—could use their studied observations about the physical world to corroborate what we read in the Bible?  Apologetics offers all that and more.  All it takes on our part is a little effort to hear them out.  You might be very surprised, as I am, to discover just how far these brainiacs can run with hard scientific evidence that proves what was written thousands of years ago by inspired writers.  It’s not just a few thoughts by a few scientists—it’s a landslide of evidence offered by an intellectual multitude.

If you want a real treat, get the Dual Revelation DVD—it gave me goosebumps.  These apologists have a powerful and refreshing way of looking at faith and the Bible.  You don’t have to park your brains at the door to be a Christian.  More to the point, our physical world does declare the glory of God.  But then again, someone came to that conclusion a long time ago.


Creation & the Bible (Apologetics Course)

“I may not be a trained speaker, but I do have knowledge.”
                                                                       2 Corinthians 11:6, NIV

We can take a clue from one of the most influential and effective writers who ever lived—knowledge is important.

I’m generally a proponent of the big-thoughts-small-words school of thinking, but have recently been impressed by an apologetics ministry called Reasons To Believe. They offer apologetics courses, which you can read about here.  If you are interested in apologetics, please consider giving their courses a go.  I’m planning on taking their course entitled Creation and the Bible, which starts March 26, 2012.  You can read about their distance learning approach at the Reasons Institute web page.

Hope to see you in class!


Luke’s Sources

Why should we trust the Gospel writers and apostles?  Good question.  Most would argue that, with the sole exception of the Apostle John, they all were martyred for their faith, and that men won’t die for something they know to be a lie.  Fair enough.  There are lots of other reasons—extrabiblical historical documentation, bibliographical tests, consistency among the canonical accounts, archaeology, internal evidence, C.S. Lewis’ famous ‘trilemma’ argument, and so on—however the purpose of this particular post is not to defend the reliability of  the Gospels.  (If you are interested in exploring the reliability of the Gospels, there are sources listed at the end of this post.)

Where did the Gospel writers get their information?  After all, two of them (Mark and Luke) weren’t eyewitnesses to the events described in their texts.

Meet Michael Card, a gifted Bible teacher and frequent contributor to Day of Discovery television, who encourages us to “read at the level of our imagination.”  In other words, put the Biblical text in its rightful context and think very carefully about what was going on.

By way of background, Ephesus became home to Luke, the Apostle John (whose tomb is there), and Mary (the mother of Jesus) in the second half of the first century.  Luke was a thorough archivist and did his homework.  His accuracy as a historian is thoroughly documented.  When he recorded Mary’s thoughts, feelings, and song in his Gospel, the obvious source of that information is his neighbor in Ephesus—Mary herself.  Likewise the Apostle John.  (By the way, if I’m reading at the level of my imagination, I’m imagining Mary singing her song for Luke.)

Luke is big on details.  Only Luke mentions Joanna by name, that she supported Jesus’ ministry out of her own means, and that she was the wife of Herod’s household manager.  What a source for information about what was said when Jesus was hauled before Herod!  Likewise, only Luke records that Joanna was one of the women who discovered the empty tomb of Jesus on Easter morning.  These two clips (from this DVD) can give you a taste of reading at the level of your imagination.  (By the way, the background in the Joanna clip will be discussed in a future post in detail—it’s the likely site of Jesus’ trial before Pilate.)

References to explore the reliability of the Gospels:
Is the Bible Reliable as a Historical Document? (Lee Strobel)
Can we trust the New Testament? (CARM)
Dartmouth Apologia
Rev. Dr. Mark D. Roberts
Center for the Study of New Testament Manuscripts
Reasons to Believe


Judge for Yourself

Here’s a short video that makes a really convincing argument in support of the dating of Easter, and may just crack the door to the possibility for new thinking.

Many Christian apologists today propose that we should apply the same burden of proof in reading the Scriptures that we would apply in a court of law.  Unfortunately our natural inclinations seem to take us beyond that standard.  Either we want a red-handed crime scene video or some elevated form of proof, or we can’t be objective beyond our own biases.

There are a lot of things we cannot know for certain, and we do indeed have to take many things on faith.  But not everything.  Isn’t it curious that once we think we know something, it tends to stay known—at least as far as we are concerned.

The truth is that modern scholarship offers up new ideas and corroborating evidence for the veracity of the Scriptures on a daily basis.  For example, among many other things I thought could not be known, I always believed that we could not know the dates of major events—such as Easter—recorded in the Scriptures.

Enter Rick Larson and others like him who are keenly inquisitive and have a passion for “puzzling things out.”  I won’t spoil the video for you, but as you consider the evidence he and others have compiled and the case they make for the exact dating of Easter, think about the burden of proof and judge for yourself.