God Dwells Among Us: A Review

G. K. Beale and Mitchell Kim's God Dwells Among Us: Expanding Eden to the End of the Earth offers a grand portrait of how the theme of the temple throughout the Bible propels the church forward into mission to a dark and hurting world.

G. K. Beale and Mitchell Kim’s God Dwells Among Us: Expanding Eden to the End of the Earth offers a grand portrait of how the theme of the temple throughout the Bible propels the church forward into mission, as a light to a dark and hurting world.

Have you ever wondered how the whole message of the Bible fits together? Moreover, how does that message impact your life and the mission of the church?

We have sixty-six books in Holy Scripture, and if you have ever read through it all, it can be puzzling to think about how everything fits in with each other. Biblical theologian Gregory Beale and pastor Mitchell Kim have put together a book that helps you gain the big picture of the Bible from Genesis to Revelation, following one theme, one particular thread tying the whole thing together.

God Dwells Among Us: Expanding Eden to the Ends of the Earth is a collection of sermons mainly by Mitchell Kim, based on a more academic work by Gregory Beale, The Temple and the Church’s Mission: A Biblical Theology of the Dwelling Place of God. In condensing and simplifying Beale’s profound work of biblical theology, Kim and Beale take the theme of the temple of God, and trace it beginning from Eden to the last chapters of the Book of Revelation. Kim and Beale’s main thesis is that God’s temple is the dwelling place of God, embodying the presence of God in creation. The temple of God is where we as humans were created to worship God, and that worship catapults the people of God into mission, whereby God’s temple is expanded throughout the whole world.

Continue reading


Four Views on the Land Promise: A Zionism Cheat-Sheet

Is the secular nation state of Israel a fulfillment of Bible prophecy? Veracity tackles a "hot potato."

Is the secular nation state of Israel a fulfillment of Bible prophecy? Veracity tackles a “hot potato.”

I am taking a short break in the middle of a multipart blog post series on the question of Christian Zionism, to address topics indirectly related to the main theme. As I have been putting posts out this summer, it occurred to me that there is a whole slew of information here. Would it not be helpful for some people to have a helpful summary, a kind of “cheat-sheet” of the main ideas?

Recently, I was going back through some of Preston Sprinkle’s “Theology in the Raw” podcasts. Preston Sprinkle is the vice president of the Boise, Idaho campus for Eternity Bible College, started by another popular author and speaker, Francis Chan. In these podcasts, Sprinkle addresses some of the tougher problems in interpreting the Bible, and one of his 15-minute topics was about four views regarding the land promise for national Israel.

Perfect! I got my cheat-sheet!

So, here it goes (thanks to Preston Sprinkle): Here are four views regarding how the land promise might be fulfilled for national Israel. It would be good first to read about the original Abrahamic covenant, whereby God promises to give to Abraham and his descendants the land of Canaan and beyond, that the Bible defines as being bounded by a river in Egypt, on one side, to the Euphrates River in modern day Iraq, on the other (Genesis 15:18-21):

  • The 1948 (Partial???) Fulfillment View: I list this one first for several reasons. First, it serves as the main theme I am addressing in the multi-part blog series. Secondly, this view, or some form of it, is the most popular view held by evangelical Christians today. Essentially, God had promised much of the Middle Eastern land to national Israel back in Abraham’s day, but the promise was never fully fulfilled. The Hebrew people inhabited part of the land for many centuries, but they kept getting kicked out of the land. But this view contends that after the Jewish people have been scattered, that they will be regathered (Ezekiel 28:25-26). This regathering promise has been fulfilled in 1948, when Israel was declared as a modern nation-state…. or at least partially, since the current nation is rather tiny compared to the full borders described in the original land promise. So, the hope is that sometime in the future, probably when the Messiah returns, that the restoration of the land promise will reach its fullness. And God always keeps His promises!
  • The Preterist Fulfillment View: “Preterism” simply means “past,” so the idea here is that the land promise to Abraham has already been fulfilled sometime in the past. The main prooftext for this view comes from Joshua 21:43-45, where Joshua states that the “the Lord gave to Israel all the land that he swore to give to their fathers. And they took possession of it, …. Not one word of all the good promises that the Lord had made to the house of Israel had failed; all came to pass.” This is talking about the period in Old Testament history when Joshua and the people of Israel had completed their conquest of Canaan. There you go! Land promise already fulfilled! There is no need for the current Zionism movement today, according to this view. This perspective is a minority among Christians today, though some scholars do embrace it.
  • The “Jesus Fulfills the Land Promise” View: This may sound a little odd, but this view contends that Jesus Himself, in a sense, fulfills all of the purposes originally set out for the Abrahamic covenant. If this view seems rather sketchy to you, then you should probably read Hebrews 3 and 4. In this passage, the writer of Hebrews is making the case that the promise of rest to Israel was never really fulfilled in Joshua’s day. God had promised the people the land, according to Joshua through Moses, to give them a place of rest (Joshua 1:13). The people had possessed the land after the conquest of Canaan, as indicated by the Preterist Fulfillment view. But this was only a temporary rest (Joshua 21:44). The people still faced difficulties in keeping the land, and the land promise was meant to be perpetual. According to the Book of Hebrews, Jesus then is the one who finally gives the promised rest, thereby fulfilling the land promise in Himself. In other words, that well-known promise of Jesus, “Come to me, all who labor and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest” (Matthew 11:28), is not just a word of spiritual encouragement, it is a radical re-interpretive fulfillment of the Old Testament Abrahamic covenant!
  • The Cosmic Fulfillment at the End Times View: This view sees that the physical piece of real estate in the Middle East is actually a foreshadowing of God’s plan to redeem the entire cosmos, the entire universe as a fulfillment of the land promise, for both believing Jew and Gentile, shared together as brothers and sisters in Christ. Therefore, there is no need for a “literal” future fulfillment of the land in the Middle East. See Romans 8:18-25 for the main idea to where this view is aiming.

There could be other views, too. But these are probably the most prominent views of the Abrahamic land promise held by Christians today. Are you still a bit confused? Are you trying to sort this all out? Then I encourage you to explore the whole, multi-part blog post series for details!


Forgotten Christians: Zionism #7

Can Palestinian Christians become the bridge to bring about peace between Israelis and Muslim Arabs? Elias Chacour, in Blood Brothers, says, "Yes."

Can Palestinian Christians become the bridge to bring about peace between Israelis and Muslim Arabs? Elias Chacour, in Blood Brothers, says, “Yes.”

In the news, we hear much about the tension between Jewish Israelis and Muslim Palestinians in the Arab-Israeli conflict. But did you know that there has been a community of Christians in the Holy Land for centuries? The story of this ancient church is often overlooked.

Since the time of the New Testament, there has been a Christian presence in the Holy Land. Possession of the land has changed multiple times over two thousand years. Pagan Rome, Zoroastrian Persians, Byzantine Orthodox Christians, Muslim Arabs, European Crusaders, and Muslim Turks have all claimed title over Jerusalem. But miraculously, the Christian church in some form or another has survived all of these various conquests. Sadly, the Christian community in Palestine today is nearly threatened with extinction.

Continue reading


Eric Metaxas’ “Replacement Theology” Once Again

Eric Metaxas, If You Can Keep It, encourages our culture to consider the legacy of American exceptionalism. I like a lot of what Metaxas has to say. But does he take us down the right road theologically?

Eric Metaxas, If You Can Keep It, encourages our culture to consider the legacy of American exceptionalism. I like a lot of what Metaxas has to say. But does he take us down the right road theologically?

It appears that Eric Metaxas is not taking the criticisms by leading evangelical historians in the best way, regarding his latest book, If You Can Keep It.  You can follow the story from an evangelical historian at Messiah College, John Fea, here. Frankly, I do not understand why Metaxas fails to see what the problem is.

Fundamentally, the issue is one of promoting confusion among evangelical readers. For example, a dedicated follower of Veracity came up to me yesterday and asked if Eric Metaxas is promoting some type of Eastern religious philosophy and mysticism. I had to go back and read my previous post to figure out what he was talking about.

Now, I can assure you. Eric Metaxas is not promoting the New Age Movement, or any other type of Eastern mysticism. But he is confusing people by making statements about American history that are not consistent with established facts.

In his book, Metaxas claims that founding father John Adams was a “committed and theologically orthodox Christian” (p. 56). However, according to the evangelical historian, Gregg Frazer, at the Masters College, John Adams believed that “orthodox” theology can be gained from reading the Hindu Shastra. I think most evangelical Christians would agree that what the Bible teaches and what Hinduism teaches, while sharing some overlapping themes and ideas, represents fundamentally different views regarding the nature of God. So, why then does Metaxas make the strange claim that John Adams was a “committed and theologically orthodox Christian?”

Metaxas’ critics, such as John Fea in the article linked above, say that it is Metaxas’ use of sources which is the problem. Sadly, Eric Metaxas makes uncritical use of the works of popular evangelical spokesperson, David Barton, to put forward many of his claims. In 2012, David Barton had one his books pulled from publication by the publisher, Thomas Nelson, due to numerous errors. So then, why is Metaxas making such heavy use of David Barton? As John Fea, Gregg Frazer, and many other evangelical historians argue, David Barton has some real problems assembling historical material together.

Again, I like Eric Metaxas. I am sure Eric Metaxas sincerely wants to serve the wider Christian community (and others) by raising historical awareness regarding the Christian heritage of America. But he does a great disservice to his readers when he spreads historical misinformation. Having the right intention is no excuse for confusing his readers with historical “facts” that distort the past. Have I made my point?

Christians, of all people, should be those who pursue and promote the truth at all costs. Should we not?


The Holy Land Today? : Zionism #6

Israel today (credit: geology.com)

Israel today (credit: geology.com)

Years ago when I first started my Christian journey and studying the Bible, I was saturated with the idea that the modern nation-state of Israel was a fulfillment of Bible prophecy. It seemed reasonable and straight-forward enough. In my church in college, it was pretty much a given that this was a clear Scriptural truth: God’s people, the Jews, had finally come home to worship their God. What could be a more obvious demonstration that the Bible is true? However, while I still find a measure of this to be compelling, I became aware that the situation was a lot more complicated than I had earlier thought. When I made a trip to the Holy Land in 1994, I discovered that Zionism, the quest for a Jewish homeland in the Middle East, was not quite what I thought it was. Here are some of the things that I learned… and the discovery of these things sent me searching.

Before going to the Holy Land, my impression was that Israel was filled with an overwhelming majority of devoutly spiritual, dedicated Jews. Every Israeli citizen was taking their turn praying by the remaining Western Wall of the old Temple, or so I thought. But during my visit there, I learned that most of the people living in Israel then were, at best, nominally Jewish.

The situation is not terribly different today. Yes, most citizens of Israel have some ethnic association with Judaism, but very few believe in the actual, traditional God of Judaism. In many ways, modern day Israel is about as secular as are countries in modern day Europe. The majority of Israelis consider themselves to be mainly atheistic or agnostic. Statistics vary, but only somewhere between 10% and 25% of the population consider themselves to be “orthodox Jews,” with even smaller percentages of other, less theologically-conservative Jews.

The Jewish people may have finally returned to their homeland, but they have done so mostly in a state of unbelief. These facts raise some difficult questions concerning Zionism.1
Continue reading