Is the Bible a reliable historical document? This is a huge topic—too ambitious for a blog post—but here’s an attempt to whet your curiosity to dig a little deeper.
Sometimes it takes quite a bit of investigation, discovery, and thinking to connect the dots. (For example, Rick Larson’s work on the Star of Bethlehem.) But there are examples that are right in our faces. Consider the Arch of Titus in Rome. Titus was the Roman commander in charge of the Siege of Jerusalem in 70 A.D., which destroyed Herod’s Temple. The Roman army carried off the Temple treasures, including the Menorah, Table of the Showbread, and Temple Trumpets. Recent research into the bas relief on the Arch of Titus has discovered that the Menorah in this frieze was originally painted gold.
Here is an extra-biblical source showing the Menorah from the Hebrew Temple, carried off in the spoils of war, and sculpted into a Roman monument by the Roman people. And it is identical to the lampstand prescribed by God to Moses in Exodus 25. And it was described in detail by (non-Christian) first-century historian Flavius Josephus, and later rabbinical sources. If you put that all together, we have extra-biblical evidence for the elements in the Holy of Holies, confirmation of a match between Scripture and what was found in the Temple, confirmation of the elements used in service by Hebrew priests, and a very big problem for those who deny that the Temple was ever on Mount Moriah. It’s as close as we can get to an ancient photograph. This particular sculpture was used to create an official seal for the modern State of Israel featuring the Menorah. So there’s one small example of the historicity of the Bible.






