Category Archives: Witnesses

Family : James Dobson (1936-2025)

My first visit to Focus on the Family headquarters in Colorado Springs was in the early 1990s. Colorado Springs was essentially the evangelical “Mecca” of North America, where numerous Christian organizations had their headquarters. Focus on the Family was by far the largest Christian organization operating in Colorado Springs, home to the Focus on the Family radio program hosted by psychologist James Dobson, who died on Thursday, August 21, 2025.

 

Focus on the Family was originally known for Dr. Dobson’s books, aimed at helping Christian parents to more effectively parent their children. His 1970 Dare to Discipline gave practical tips to parents frustrated with how to best discipline their children, and raise them to become responsible young adults, and to hopefully pass their Christian faith to the next generation. Other popular Dobson books, like The Strong Willed Child and Bringing Up Boys, followed over the years. Dobson’s methods were seen to be a more traditional alternative to the popular, more secular-oriented approach to parenting advocated by another psychologist, Dr. Benjamin Spock, author of the 1946 best-seller Baby and Child Care, who opted for more permissive methods.

Focus on the Family was founded in 1977, becoming a media empire providing resources for Christian parents. In 1987, Adventures in Odyssey became the most well-known radio resource, aimed at instilling Christian values in kids, with over 1,000 recorded shows to date. The program has featured 30-minute comedy-drama episodes revolving around children in a small Midwest town, associated with an ice cream shop and emporium operated by a Mr. John Avery Whitaker.

While James Dobson was primarily known for integrating child psychology with Christian values, he became increasingly more involved in political causes, particularly through the 1990s. Dobson believed that there was a cultural collapse of “family values,” stemming from the rise of the counterculture movement of the 1960s. Dobson urged that Christians get more involved in political affairs, as a means defending against what he saw as attacks on the family.

In particular, James Dobson was opposed to the increasing public acceptance of same-sex marriage, and toleration for homosexuality in general across American society at large. He viewed same-sex attraction to be a result of environmental factors, and not something associated with birth. Dobson also opposed abortion and in more recent times spoke out against the transgender movement.

Despite being controversial in the wider culture, Dobson was controversial in certain Christian circles as well. In the early 2010’s, The Truth Project produced by Focus on the Family, narrated by Del Tackett, was a small-group curriculum program developed for churches, which aimed at developing a “Christian worldview.” Enthusiasts for The Truth Project appreciated the program’s “family values” orientation and encouraging Christian civic involvement, while critics of the program objected to what was seen as promoting a twisted view of science, with critics on one side claiming that The Truth Project was teaching anti-science propaganda, while those on another side objected to an attempt to smuggle in harmful, modernist psychotherapy into the church. Others were concerned about The Truth Project trying to politicize the Gospel, by hitching Christianity wrongly to right-wing politics.

There are countless stories of children growing up in the 1990’s in evangelical Christian homes, who recall long car trips with their parents, while their parents turned on the radio to listen to various Focus on the Family broadcasts. Some of these kids look back on those times in the car with fond memories. Other kids, not so much.

Dobson grew up in a home where his two parents were traveling evangelists in the Nazarene church. Despite James Dobson’s background growing up in a relatively egalitarian family, he became a stalwart advocate of complementarian theology, believing that men and women were equal in the sight of God, but that they occupied different roles in the home and in the family. Dobson believed that Christian husbands and fathers should be leaders in their homes, and that women should not serve as elders in their local churches.

James Dobson was a supporter of the Danvers Statement, which led to the creation of the Council for Biblical Manhood and Womanhood in 1987. In 1997, Dobson learned that the version of the Odyssey Bible which Focus on the Family published used gender-inclusive language. Dobson promptly discontinued use of this edition of the Odyssey Bible, offering refunds for purchases of the Bible.

The incident encouraged Dobson to call together Christian leaders to speak out against efforts by Zondervan’s New International Version of the Bible to produce any future gender-inclusive Bible versions.  What came out of that meeting was something called the Colorado Spring Guidelines, which argued for a “gender-accurate” as opposed to a “gender-neutral” approach to Bible translation.

The NIV Committee on Bible Translation still went ahead with publishing a toned-down “inclusive” version of the Bible, the TNIV (Today’s New International Version), which still had some gender-neutral language in it. The controversy with the TNIV in 2005 eventually led to the version being discontinued. In response, a new Bible translation, the English Standard Version (ESV) was developed independently from the work of the NIV, favoring a more complementarian theology, particularly in the Bible study notes. Furthermore, the NIV Committee on Bible Translation revamped and produced yet another revised version, the NIV 2011, which sought to find some kind of halfway meeting spot between complementarian and egalitarian Bible scholars, along the lines of conforming to the Colorado Springs Guidelines. So while James Dobson was not a Bible scholar himself, his pervasive influence in evangelical circles has had a significant impact on what today’s Bible translations among evangelicals look like today.

That year I was in Colorado Springs visiting Focus on the Family, I once spotted what I thought was a bumper sticker that said: “Keep Your Focus on Your Own &#%@*!! Family.”

While Dr. Dobson had many detractors, particularly among “ex-evangelicals,” his gentle demeanor won him many other admirers. Millions of listeners still tune into radio or Internet programs founded or inspired by the work of James Dobson.

In 2010, James Dobson left Focus on the Family, helping to pave the way for new leadership under Jim Daly. Dobson was now in his mid-70s, and he felt it best that a new leader take Focus on the Family towards having a softer, less-political message that would appeal more to young families. Dobson died at the age of 89. Tributes to Dr. Dobson’s legacy from a number of Christian and other cultural leaders can be found at Focus on the Family’s website.

Below is short interview by California pastor Greg Laurie with James Dobson:

 


Expository: John MacArthur 1939-2025

Southern California pastor, John MacArthur, a popular Bible teacher excelled in expository preaching, while unafraid of wading into controversy.

 

Just learned last night that John F. MacArthur Jr., a well-known Bible teacher at Grace Community Church, died at age 86. Christianity Today published a remembrance of this beloved Bible preacher.

John MacArthur was one of those people who had the strength of his convictions, who was not shy about speaking what he considered to be the truth. Perhaps the greatest strength in his ministry was his commitment to expository teaching from the Bible. He started preaching at Grace Community Church at age 29, and to my knowledge, went verse-by-verse through every book of the New Testament, and much of the Old Testament, before he died. It took him 42 years to cover the entire New Testament. Grace Community Church grew dramatically with that kind of preaching, becoming one of the largest churches in Los Angeles. MacArthur was often considered to be the dean of expository preachers.

However, MacArthur was not without controversy. Charismatic Christians were frustrated by him. He was unwavering in his commitment to Young Earth Creationism. Women were not allowed ever to speak in any leading capacity in his church, nor were any women allowed to lead even in singing for worship. He believed that so-called Christian “social justice” was compromise of the Gospel. He was really rough on Roman Catholics. He minimized mental health issues. Once he made what he thought was a sufficient study of a doctrine of Scripture, there was no changing of his mind. He even promoted his specific teachings through his popular annotated John MacArthur Study Bible.

MacArthur got a number of things right. He promoted the idea of “Lordship Salvation,” suggesting that it was wrong to think that you can have Jesus as your Savior but NOT as your Lord. He was suspicious of attempts to find truth in forms of Christian mysticism, which were not properly grounded in the text of Scripture. He made it a point to say that the Greek word often translated as “servant” in the Gospels should in most (if not all) cases be translated as “slave,” as it is more consistently done in the Legacy Standard Bible, which he helped to develop. He affirmed biblical inerrancy, even though his view was very strict.

MacArthur also got a lot of things wrong. Dead wrong in my view.

But one thing I can always respect him for was a love for the text of Scripture. He rightly chided other pastors who skipped passages of the Bible which were “too hard” or too controversial. Simply doing topical preaching, a common practice taught in many seminaries to seminarians today, simply would not do for MacArthur. I have come to agree with him (though I do not mind more “topical” preaching sessions every so-often as a change of pace). It took him almost eight years to cover the Book of Romans. Over the years, I have grown more fond of MacArthur’s way of approaching the Scriptures in a verse-by-verse manner. Life is just too short to get piece-meal sound-bites from the Bible on Sunday mornings.

This beloved and controversial preacher will be missed by many. May his soul rest in peace.

 

 

 


Daws, the Early Story of the Navigators, A Review

Dawson Trotman (1906-1956) was the founder of the Navigators, one of the most influential evangelical missionary movements begun in the mid-20th century. Daws: The Story of Dawson Trotman, Founder of the The Navigators, written by Betty Lee Skinner in 1974, tells the story of this man who interacted with some of the leading figures of American evangelical Christianity of the 20th century.

Skinner, who had worked in communications with the Navigators ministry for years, died in 2013, about a year after I started to read this book. My wife and I had decided to visit friends in Colorado, but we took a few days to visit Glen Eyrie, the home of the Navigators, known for its famous castle built by the founder of the city of Colorado Springs, William Jackson Palmer, nestled in the foothills of the Rocky Mountains, next to the Garden of the Gods city park. We arrived at Glen Eyrie less than two weeks after the 2012 Waldo Canyon Fire had devastated several neighborhoods surrounding Colorado Springs. I climbed a ridge at the edge of the Glen Eyrie property and looked over to see hundreds of homes that had been completely wiped out by the fire, which came almost within a mile from the Glen Eyrie property.

It was an eerie setting to begin reading Daws. There was this sense that God protected Glen Eyrie from the fire in much the same way God protected and helped the ministry of the Navigators to flourish in those early years led by the energetic and single-minded Dawson Trotman.

Betty Lee Skinner’s Daws is an inspiring read, about the man who gave the evangelical world great tools for discipleship, like the Wheel Illustration, the Bridge Illustration, and Word Hand Illustration, and the Big Dipper. That man was Dawson Trotman.

 

Daws tells a remarkable story, but the book at just under 400 pages in fairly tight print, is pretty long, which explains why it took me so long to finish the book. Skinner peppers the text with so many names that it is difficult to keep track of who is who (How did Skinner, a close associate with Trotman, keep such detailed records?). All the minutia was a bit too much “TMI” for me (“Too Much Information”). Some twelve years later, I finally made it all the way through the book. For a quicker read, I would recommend Robert D. Foster’s The Navigator for a shorter survey of the life of this remarkable man. But I wanted to tackle Daws to get an in-depth feel for what made this man, Dawson Trotman, tick. Skinner’s attention to detail shows that Dawson Trotman was an amazing human being.

Dawson Trotman grew up in Southern California, becoming a fine athlete, the valedictorian of his high school, and the student body president. But after high school, Trotman floundered. He worked in a lumberyard, where he developed a penchant for gambling, learned how to be a pool shark at the billiard table, and got drunk with his friends more than once.

He had not grown up in much of a Christian family, only going to church every now and then, mostly spurred on by the influence of his mother, but not his father.  Yet his church going did not seem to keep his behavior in line. Even in high school, he had been stealing regularly from the school’s locker fund. He felt terribly guilty about what he had done, but he felt like there was nothing he could do about it.

After high school, after one night of getting drunk and picked up by the police, Dawson slipped away from his friends to attend a church meeting at a nearby Presbyterian church where there was a Scripture memory contest. There he promised to memorize ten Bible verses. He came back to the meeting the following week and he was the only guy who managed to memorize all ten verses.

One of the verses was John 1:12, which he had memorized in the King James Version: “But as many as received him, to them gave the power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name.” While walking on his way to work one day, that verse came to mind. It was like the Apostle’s Paul “road to Damascus” experience or Saint Augustine of Hippo’s “tolle lege” moment, “take up and read.” By the time he made it to the lumberyard for his shift, his life trajectory had been set.

Within a few years, Trotman had taken a Bible class taught by legendary evangelist Charles E. Fuller, the future founder of Fuller Theological Seminary, on the Book of Romans and Ephesians. He wanted to give his whole life to full-time Christian work. Trotman developed this principle of learning to find simply one other man he could pour his life into, who could then go on to find another man who could do the same, based on 2 Timothy 2:2.

Scripture memorization was at the heart of such one-on-one encounters.  He had the greatest early success working with Navy sailors aboard the U.S.S. West Virginia. He married a woman he had known from high school who was also a Christian, Lila. They began Bible studies for Navy servicemen in their home. This was how the Navigators ministry was born.

It was a pivotal time between the two world wars. By the time the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor in 1841, the Navigators were multiplying all across the Navy, and the Navigator ministry was spreading out among businessmen, nurses, and other groups. The U.S.S. West Virginia was one of first ships attacked at Pearl Harbor, and the Navigator men of that ship were dispersed across other ships in the Navy, inspired by Trotman’s example, replicating this multiplication method of disciple-making taught by Trotman.

Over those decades and even after World War 2, Trotman and other Navigator disciples developed various tools for training men to learn to follow Jesus. The “Wheel illustration” placed the life of “the obedient Christian in action” on the rim of the wheel, with Christ at the center hub, with four spokes supporting the wheel: Prayer, the Word, Witnessing, and “Living the Life” (or Fellowship with other believers). Each component of the wheel had a Bible verse or set of verses to be memorized to go along with the illustration.

The “Bridge illustration” showed a great chasm between two cliff edges. On one cliff edge was the “wages of sin is death” (Romans 6:23) and on the other cliff edge was “eternal life” in Christ. The cross of Jesus was placed across the chasm, thereby enabling a person to cross the bridge from death to life. The “Hand illustration” showed a hand grasping the Bible, where each finger represents a principle: the little finger (hearing), the ring finger (reading), the middle finger (studying), the index finger (memorizing), and the thumb (meditation). Many like myself continue to use these tools today.

Reading Daws gives you the story of how these various discipleship principles and illustrations were spread out and copied across divergent Christian ministries of the 20th century.  Evangelist Billy Graham met Trotman and began to use these Navigator principles for follow-up in his crusade meetings. While driving out to California, a young Bill Bright picked up a hitch-hiker, who invited Bright, who was not yet a Christian, to spend his first night at the Navigator home of the Trotmans. Bill Bright would eventually become the founder of Campus Crusade for Christ, now called “CRU.”  Jim Rayburn, the founder of Young Life, became best friends with Dawson Trotman. Henrietta Mears, the highly influential Sunday School leader at Hollywood Presbyterian Church, mentored Trotman. Wycliffe Bible Translators’ Cam Townsend invited Trotman to train his staff in Scripture memory principles. Reading Daws for me was like going through a survey of “Who’s Who” in American 20th century evangelicalism, so wide was the reach of Dawson Trotman.

Dawson Trotman was a man with a singular focus and vision in life. This virtue enabled him to chart a life course and principles which continues to indirectly impact countless people well over a half century later. Yet it is also a characteristic which has not always appealed to others. He was highly disciplined, a quality that served well in the Navigator outreach to Navy personnel. But Daws would publicly call out men who had not memorized their verses at meetings, which spurred some to work harder at it, while alienating others. There is no doubt: Daws was an extroverted perfectionist.

For decades after his death, the personality of Daws could still be felt. When the Navigators tried to extend their outreach towards college students, the regimentation expected did not always suit the college environment that well, and by the late 1980s, the college ministry efforts of the Navigators began to shrink. In my college years, my friends often joked that the Navigators were more rightly called the “Never-Daters,” as they tended to encourage sharper lines in terms of male and female interactions in their ministry efforts. Unlike other ministries like Young Life, CRU, and InterVarsity Christian Fellowship, which all target specific age groups and different communities, the Navigators have tended to ebb and flow in their efforts to target specific communities.

But what Navigators has done and continues to do best, as set forward by Dawson Trotman’s example, is map out an effective strategy for one-on-one Christian disciple making, no matter what the cultural and community context.  Many Christians I have known for years take small note cards or sticky-notes, writing out Scripture verses on them, placing them on kitchen refrigerators, bathroom sinks, and car dashboards, to help with Scripture memorization, an idea taken from the Navigators Topical Memory System, which Dawson Trotman helped to pioneer. The Bridge illustration for sharing one’s faith with another person is an enduring classic still drawn out on paper napkins in coffee houses and restaurants somewhere in the world every day.

The story which Skinner tells about the acquisition of the Glen Eyrie property, for use as the Navigators headquarters, is inspiring on its own. Trotman was absolutely convinced that God wanted the Navigators to have Glen Eyrie, but there was no money for it when the acquisition was first proposed. Setback after setback continually arose in the months prior to the deadline for the sale. Yet at different stages of the process, money would come in just in the nick of time. Disaster loomed just near the closure of the deal, as the entire sum of the money that was raised was accidentally wired to the wrong bank, and the mistake was not uncovered until after the bank had closed for the day. But the owner of the bank was also a Navigators donor, and so he reopened the bank, enabling Trotman to finalize the sale in the last few hours. Trotman’s journey of faith was filled with suspense!!

In 1956, Dawson Trotman was a speaker at Jack Wyrtzen’s Word of Life camp at Schroon Lake, in upstate New York. Four days earlier, Trotman had given his last message to Navigator staff at Glen Eyrie on the Big Dipper illustration, summarizing all of the components of effective Navigator discipleship.

That afternoon at the Word of Life camp, Jack Wyrtzen took Trotman and a few campers on a boat ride to do some water skiing.  At one moment, the boat hit some choppy water, throwing both Trotman and a young female camper into the water. Trotman did his best to save the life of this young woman by holding her up to keep her from drowning, which he did. However, after years of driving a hard schedule, Dawson Trotman was mentally and physically exhausted. So in the process of trying to save the other camper, who apparently did not know how to swim, Trotman himself drowned, thus ending the life of one of American evangelicalism’s most influential leaders.  At his memorial service held at Glen Eyrie, Billy Graham stated that “Daws died the same way he lived—holding others up.”

Daws is also an examination of a much different spiritual climate during the early to mid 20th century. Soul-winning and discipleship making based on Scripture memorization made sense to an American society which was culturally Christian. But Daws rarely, if ever, discusses Christian apologetics, which is now so central to evangelistic work in the 21st century, when so many people have questions about the trustworthiness and clarity of the Bible. The early Navigators work simply assumed that most people they worked with believed the Bible to be true and straight-forwardly interpreted. Trotman never had to deal with the confusion of truth promoted by our current age of social media.

The challenge for discipling people back then among the Navigators was in the realm of application. Today, the cultural climate is a lot more skeptical about the truthfulness of the Christian faith, a step that needs to be addressed before you even get to the application of what the Bible teaches. Furthermore, young people today are looking for authenticity and trustworthiness, in an age when Christians are often viewed with some degree of suspicion. Technology can be both an aid to discipleship, as well as being a distraction undermining discipleship.

In other words, here in the 21st century we simply can not assume that drawing “The Bridge” illustration on a paper napkin while having lunch with an inquiring friend will be enough to woo a non-believer to pursue having a relationship with Jesus. Those days of assuming a biblically literate culture that Dawson Trotman worked in no longer make sense in a pluralistic society which is suspicious of the moral and metaphysical claims of the Christian faith. Human brokenness compound the problem, where many today live lives of isolation and loneliness to a greater degree than in Dawson Trotman’s day. Daws gave us some basic tools to work with, but nearly a century later we need to tweak and refine some of the those tools in order to sensibly connect with people who desperately need to know the Good News of Jesus.

The Navigators today are still a flourishing ministry, though a look at their website can tell you that there is no specific target cultural group or community that the Navigators are trying to reach. The vision is still all about one-on-one discipleship, equipping disciples with tools like Scripture memory, which is the core DNA of what made Dawson Trotman tick.

While Betty Lee Skinner’s Daws is on the rather long side, her book gives interested readers a studied look into the life of one of the great Christian leaders of the 20th century, whose influence continues on into the 21st century.

The follow videos explain several of the most helpful illustrations developed by Dawson Trotman and the early Navigators ministry.


Frank Turek at William & Mary: February 20, 2025, 7pm

Dr. Frank Turek, a Christian evangelist and apologist, will be speaking at the College of William and Mary, on Thursday, February, 20, 2025, 7pm-9pm, at the Commonwealth Auditorium, in the Sadler Center, the main student gathering place on campus.

Frank Turek is the author of I Don’t Have Enough Faith to Be an Atheist, co-authored with the late Norman Geisler. He gives talks at colleges and universities across the country covering the primary questions discussed in his book:

  • Does truth exist?
  • Does God exist?
  • Are miracles possible?
  • Is the New Testament true?

His talk at William & Mary will be followed by a Q&A session. This event is sponsored by the William & Mary Apologetics Club, and is open to the public.

From his CrossExamined.org website, “Frank is a widely featured guest in the media as a leading apologetics expert and cultural commentator. He has appeared on hundreds of radio programs and many top TV networks including: Fox News, ABC, and CBS. He also writes a column for Townhall.com and several other sites.

A former aviator in the US Navy, Frank has a master’s degree from George Washington University and a doctorate from Southern Evangelical Seminary.  He and his wife, Stephanie, are blessed with three grown sons and two grandsons (so far).”

Frank hosts the CrossExamined radio program on American Family Radio, and has a Wesleyan theological background. He has publicly debated prominent atheists about the truth claims of the Christian faith, such as Michael Shermer and the late Christopher Hitchens. Frank gives thoughtful answers to a wide range of questions raised by skeptics and inquiring Christians from the floor.

The event maybe livestreamed. If so I will update with a link here.

Below is a 2-minute clip of one student asking Frank a question, followed with his answer:

 


The Real Indiana Jones: Kenneth Kitchen (1932-2025)

I just read today that one of the world’s most recognized Egyptologists, Kenneth Kitchen, died Thursday, February 6, 2025, at age 93. Kitchen was an idiosyncratic legend, an archaeologist who studied the Ancient Near East, specializing in ancient Egyptian history, and who upheld the Old Testament as a reliable source for understanding the history of the ancient world.  In my mind, he was the “real Indiana Jones.”

Few today would be dazzled by Kitchen’s study on The Third Intermediate Period in Egypt. But for the Christian interested in  the intersection between the Bible and archaeology, his 2003 erudite defense of the Bible, On the Reliability of the Old Testament, stands squarely in the maximalist tradition, affirming the historicity of the Exodus and the biblical Patriarchs. I read his book almost twenty years ago and was blown away by the breadth and depth of his scholarship.

While many scholars today tend to be skeptical of the story of Moses and the flight of Israel out of Egypt, spending forty years wandering the Sinai desert, Kenneth Kitchen was resolute in marshaling detailed evidence to support the testimony of the Bible. Kitchen was careful not to say that the biblical stories of the Patriarchs could be “proved” by the archaeological record, but he likewise stressed that archaeology has not “disproved” this history as presented in the Bible either.

Kenneth A. Kitchen’s On the Reliability of the Old Testament is a modern classic defending the historicity of the Old Testament. Kitchen begins with the most recent period in Israelite history, working his way backwards towards the earliest Patriarchs, showing that figures like Moses and Abraham line up with what we read in the archaeological record.

 

Born in Scotland, the life-long bachelor Kitchen was a contrarian in several ways, and not afraid of being combative in his research. Not only did he take on minimalist colleagues, such as Ronald Hendel, who concluded that the historical Moses was a fictional product of Israelite imagination at least four or five centuries after the traditionally dated Exodus period, Kitchen was critical of even conservative Old Testament scholars for not reading the text carefully enough.  He rejected the traditional, early date for the Exodus, in the mid 15th century BCE, around the year 1446, while Amenhotep I, Thutmose I, or Thutmose III served as Pharaoh, an interpretation which has been based on a non-metaphorical reading of the years described in 1 Kings 6. Archaeologists like Bryant Wood continue to hold to this traditional view.

Instead, Kitchen favored a late date alternative, about 200 years later in the 13th century BCE, when Rameses II served as Pharaoh. Kitchen argued that the early date has lacked sufficient archaeological support. Instead, the city of Rameses in Egypt was known in the 13th century, corresponding to what has been read from Exodus 1:11, and that archaeological evidence for the destruction of Hazor in the 13th century matched what has been described by Joshua’s conquest of the Promised Land in Joshua 11:10-11.

Kitchen also chided Old Testament scholars who insisted that the large numbers associated with texts like the census in Numbers 1-2, following a non-metaphorical interpretation of such numbers, did not match the archaeological data, which has supported a smaller, yet still sizable group of Israelites wandering the Sinai wilderness for some 40 years.

Kitchen’s views even went against the idiosyncratic proposal by atheist and fellow Egyptologist David Rohl, who has argued that a new chronology for Egyptian history should be adopted, which pushes the possible date for the Exodus earlier than what the late date proposes.  David Rohl’s innovative hypothesis has been popularized by Tim Mahoney’s Patterns of Evidence franchise of documentary filmmaking. Kitchen rejected this view as “100% nonsense.”

Kenneth Kitchen’s work has been echoed with support by Trinity Evangelical Divinity School emeritus professor, archaeologist, and Egyptologist, James K. Hoffmeier, and on YouTube, a younger student who studied under Kitchen, Egyptologist David A. Falk, hosts the channel Ancient Egypt and the Bible. Falk has a recent YouTube stream remembering his mentor, Kenneth A. Kitchen.

What helped to win me over to the late date for the Exodus was the argument regarding the location of the slave city near a residence for the Pharaoh. The ancient city of Thebes, located near modern day Luxor, Egypt, was the primary residence for the Pharaohs during the Late Bronze Age. However, we have evidence that in the 13th century the city of Rameses, thought to have been a residence of a Pharaoh of the same name, was located in the Nile delta area. Rameses was in the northeast region of Egypt not that far from the modern city of Cario, and was built by slaves living in a nearby slave city, Avaris.

The journey from that slave city to Rameses would have been less than a few hours by foot, which makes sense of the many meetings that Moses would have had with Pharaoh mentioned in the Book of Exodus. However, any look at the map shows that a journey from the Nile delta to Thebes took at least 6 days to walk, which makes the late-at-night journeys that Moses took from the slave city to Pharoah’s residence rather ludicrous. Unless the Hebrews had built some nuclear-powered speed boat for Moses to travel quickly up the Nile to visit Pharaoh in Thebes, it is hard to imagine how Moses could have made such a relatively quick visit in the middle of the night to Pharoah.

Advocates for an early date for the Exodus might respond by saying a 15th century Pharoah might have built a residence within close walking distance near the 15th century slave city or encampment, but that we simply do not have evidence for such a residence…. at least not yet. But why appeal to evidence we do not currently possess when we actually have evidence that supports a different date, and that still affirms the testimony of Scripture? In my mind, this is a case of having a bird in the hand is worth two in a bush. It is better to hold onto the evidence you already have than it is holding out for evidence which you may never find. Kitchen was that type of evidentialist who opted for the former.

What I did not know about Kitchen was just how idiosyncratic he really was. As Tyndale House scholar Peter J. Williams puts it:

His abode was a small three-bedroom terraced house, without central heating or any modern appliance. [Kitchen] was very proud that nothing was connected to the internet so there could be no possibility of a virus destroying his work…..

Ken Kitchen basically didn’t have a kitchen: it was a tiny box room. Ken lived all his life without a refrigerator. He had milk delivered fresh, and had no need for the complexities of unnecessary equipment. He lived in the utmost simplicity….

Despite his great learning, Ken Kitchen was a man of a deep and simple faith in Jesus Christ as his Saviour and Lord. Though he knew a lot, he was also humble and aware of his own fallibility and frailty. He would want us in remembering him to think of the One he served. As I think about Ken’s life, as a bachelor living a life of ascetic discipline and dedication to scholarship, I find myself challenged by his work ethic and his incredible focus, even as I recognise that Ken was one of a kind. We will not see the like of him again.

Actually, in his later years, Kitchen finally was forced to get a refrigerator after he contracted food poisoning. His doctor strongly advised him to a get refrigerator, for his own safety.

Read more of Peter Williams’ obituary remembering the “real Indiana Jones,” Kenneth A. Kitchen.

A young Kenneth A. Kitchen doing field work for his Egyptological studies.

Here are some links to older Veracity articles about the Exodus, the conquest of Canaan and the problem of large numbers, the difference between maximalists and minimalists in relating archaeology to the study of the Bible, the status of the city of Jericho in biblical history,  a review of a Patterns of Evidence film, by Tim Mahoney, and the fringe archaeology of the late Ron Wyatt, who portrayed himself as a kind of evangelical Indiana Jones.

NOTE: The original blog post had a title with his death in “1925,” instead of “2025,” which was obviously a typographical error.